Certainly, there has been a bunch of noise lately about the trendy coffee conglomerate Starbucks, and their association, or lack thereof, to the second amendment of the Us Constitution. The 2nd amendment, lest you've already lost sight of those high-school government requirements, spells out the right of American civilians to keep and bear arms. Actually, the 2nd Amendment is often regarded simply as "the right of the people to keep and bear arms". It was actually adopted in 1791, when the Bill of Rights was first accepted. Since that time, we've joined a type of on-going argumentative discussion over the worth and imperative of the right for one to keep and bear personal, independently owned firearms.
Starbucks, it appears, has decided to support this liberty, and allow its customers to bring firearms into its retail stores. This discussion took a very interesting turn recently, when, after being petitioned by thousands, being asked at a shareholders meeting, and a direct appeal to their Board, not to allow the guns in their stores, Starbucks took a stand in favor of the right for its customers to bear arms in their stores, as long as it was in a legal manner, of course. It was then, that a national anti-gun group called the National Gun Victims Action Council called for an outright boycott of Starbucks on Valentine's Day of 2012.
Here's the kicker though, rather than causing a huge stir over the practicing of this constitutional right (link here), the event had the incredible, to some, repercussion of actually encouraging the pro-gun crowd to actualize their own display of a public boycott, of the biases of anti-gun activists.
Reportedly, there were tens of thousands of gun adoring people that made a point to deliberately buy a coffee at Starbucks on Valentine's Day, and when feasible, use a two dollar bill to purchase it as an indicator of their support of Starbucks acknowledgment of the 2nd Amendment. There were even Facebook pages devoted to the holiday event. While Starbucks stated that business was virtually the same as any other day, in most ways, they did make known the uncommon oddity of getting lots of two-dollar bills that day. Starbucks is rather unique for a commercial entity, in that it is the only large nationwide chain that has publicly accepted the peoples constitutional freedoms, and permitted legally carried firearms within its doors.
So here's to ongoing support of the constitutional right to keep and bear arms, and the clear-sighted judgment of Starbucks in adopting this stance on the issue, even though, by law, they really did didn't have to. After all, the amendment says "the right of the people to keep and bear arms" not "the right to bring guns into a retail establishment regardless off the proprietors consent". Good play, Starbucks, even if your coffee IS over-roasted and way too expensive for the average consumer.
Starbucks, it appears, has decided to support this liberty, and allow its customers to bring firearms into its retail stores. This discussion took a very interesting turn recently, when, after being petitioned by thousands, being asked at a shareholders meeting, and a direct appeal to their Board, not to allow the guns in their stores, Starbucks took a stand in favor of the right for its customers to bear arms in their stores, as long as it was in a legal manner, of course. It was then, that a national anti-gun group called the National Gun Victims Action Council called for an outright boycott of Starbucks on Valentine's Day of 2012.
Here's the kicker though, rather than causing a huge stir over the practicing of this constitutional right (link here), the event had the incredible, to some, repercussion of actually encouraging the pro-gun crowd to actualize their own display of a public boycott, of the biases of anti-gun activists.
Reportedly, there were tens of thousands of gun adoring people that made a point to deliberately buy a coffee at Starbucks on Valentine's Day, and when feasible, use a two dollar bill to purchase it as an indicator of their support of Starbucks acknowledgment of the 2nd Amendment. There were even Facebook pages devoted to the holiday event. While Starbucks stated that business was virtually the same as any other day, in most ways, they did make known the uncommon oddity of getting lots of two-dollar bills that day. Starbucks is rather unique for a commercial entity, in that it is the only large nationwide chain that has publicly accepted the peoples constitutional freedoms, and permitted legally carried firearms within its doors.
So here's to ongoing support of the constitutional right to keep and bear arms, and the clear-sighted judgment of Starbucks in adopting this stance on the issue, even though, by law, they really did didn't have to. After all, the amendment says "the right of the people to keep and bear arms" not "the right to bring guns into a retail establishment regardless off the proprietors consent". Good play, Starbucks, even if your coffee IS over-roasted and way too expensive for the average consumer.
About the Author:
If you've been surfing for authoritative reviews of the finest the second amendment, surf no longer. We've put in hours examining the 1928 two dollar bill on the world wide web and display it at our web site so our visitors can benefit.
Posting Komentar